ugly though it may be, in the event that there really is someone going around stealing car parts, if the condition of this car doesn't deter them, this security measure actually would raise the bar of difficulty for such thieves.
it seems like it could actually be an effective security strategy, if only the threat didn't seem so imaginary.
great to see that at least sometimes the police are not above the law. not so great to see an off-duty cop putting peoples lives in danger or not complying with the the officer trying to pull him over sooner, almost like he thought he could get away. you've got to wonder about a cop who thinks he can succeed by acting like a crook.
this isn't just in funny pictures online. more and more i'm seeing CAPTCHA's that use characters that bare no resemblance to anything i can actually type with my keyboard, leading me to one inescapable conclusion - you need to use magic to solve these things; they're CAPTCHAs for wizards.
so, they're not actually for self defense, and apparently they're not even really brass knuckles (which is good because then it'd be against the law to carry them, possibly even this way), but i can't be the only one who looked at them and wondered "how can they use those now?"
what do you think? would pants like these promote passwords with more complexity, or would he simply be hitting the same small group of keys over and over again?
APT (advanced persistent threat) is abused and misused so much by security marketing departments (and people who aren't in marketing but are still doing marketing) that abusing the term has itself become a meme. it really needs an anti-body meme to counter it.
there's a term that gets bandied about in some security circles - cyber-douchery. the coining of this new and decidedly scaremongering sort of term really seems to qualify as cyber-douchery.
that's not to say the topic of SCADA vulnerability to attack isn't real or isn't scary, it is, but cyber hiroshima? really? there's no need to evoke irrational responses from your audience.
are you thinking what i'm thinking? 'cause i'm thinking someone should actually make this monopoly variant called crackopoly. no doubt some would prefer to call it hackopoly, but it appears that one's already been done (and with a much more appropriate definition of "hack" it seems).
sometimes i get the feeling that the concept of keeping a low profile (a necessity for a criminal) is more confusing to people now that we have facebook profiles. obviously there's no "low" setting on them, and even if there were, it would probably be talking about privacy where "low" would be the last thing a crook would want. hurray for dumb criminals.
now, unless microsoft security essentials has begun adding detection for business threats, i think it's safe to assume the alert on google's main page is a false alarm. but you could almost believe this was on purpose, couldn't you?
attention to detail is kind of important in security. you've got to be on the look out for things that are out of place, things that don't belong - like those letters don't belong in that order.
of course, the spelling isn't really important for security, but i suspect the score of that game isn't either.
this is, of course, prank (and a pretty funny one at that). but it's a prank where the prankster is posing as something that's supposed to represent authority. the authorities don't take kindly to people impersonating them or anything connected to them - the opportunities to damage their credibility is too great.
of course, in some countries, the authorities are quite proficient at damaging their own credibility.
here's a special post to commemorate this unusual conjunction of valentines day and patch tuesday. not sure how often this happens, but i bet it's not often.
online valentines are usually all thorn and no flower.
an unfortunate truth that the love lorn have discovered over and over again. you'd think people would have learned their lesson with the loveletter email worm, but hope springs eternal it seems.
figuratively, shooting yourself in the foot means that you ruin your ambitions or career. presumably that came from a literal case where someone actually shot themselves in the foot and it ruined their plans - not unlike this fellow.
i can't really explain how this popped into my head, i can only show you that it did.
look at my rogue my rogue is amazing give it a click -hmm, looks like i need saving
with a change of it's name it turns into a game of cat and mouse with the lame 'till i recompile it's source -ooh that's much worse
do you think so? well i better not show you how the fake AV is made 1337 fake AV, mmm 1337 fake AV 1337 fake AV, yeah 1337 fake AV
install my rogue i'll save you on the internets and all the other websites too -i think you'll find that the internet pretty much covers everything shut up victim, install my rogue
(in case you don't know 1337 is pronouced 'leet' and is a slang version of the word "elite")
y'know, by any reasonable, functional definition, downloading personal information without the user's knowledge or consent qualifies an app as spyware. i doubted path was the only company who did this, and in fact it turns out that many have, so it seems to me that there is in fact malware in the iOS app store right this minute. there's no anti-virus though, because apple won't allow it.
whether or not things like android.counterclank qualify as malware or not (do the intricacies of malicious intent really matter when the unanimous consensus among users is that it's unwanted?) is of secondary importance to me. what really boggles my mind is that mobile app developers are actually falling for this con when desktop adware is still so fresh in people's minds (well, my mind, at any rate).
so apparently someone in anonymous finally figured out how to provide their DDoS minions with plausible deniability, even if they can't provide them with actual anonymity. low orbit ion cannon has been made into a web-based version that people can be tricked into visiting and launching attacks from their browser.
sometimes the line between malware and legitimate software isn't as clear-cut as we'd like (such as opt-in adware, or spyware to monitor prison inmates) so i started to wonder (genuinely) whether windows genuine advantage could qualify as a kind of ransomware. after all, it does demand that you (if you have a pirated copy of windows) pay microsoft for a legal copy of their software and prevents certain functions until you do.
apparently ransomware (malicious software that demands a ransom in order to regain access to your computer or prevent notification of authorities to supposed illegal activity) is on the rise. we'll see if backup media will follow suit.